Product and sample trial guide
Prepare representative product, packs, acceptance checks and a repeatable test sequence.
Filling machinery buyer guide
The correct filling method starts with what must be dosed and how the finished pack will be judged. Product flow, entrained air, particles, dust, fill range, container opening, hygiene and changeover needs can matter more than the nominal container volume.
A useful filling-machine specification describes the product under production conditions. Record whether it is free-flowing, viscous, stringy, foaming, abrasive, shear-sensitive, dusty, cohesive or prone to settling. Identify particles, fibres or inclusions and the largest item that must pass through the product path. State the normal product temperature and whether viscosity changes during the shift. For powders and granules, note bulk-density variation, aeration, static, dust and whether the material bridges or compacts.
The product description should also cover cleaning and segregation. A filler used for one stable product can be arranged differently from equipment changing between flavours, colours, allergens, fragrances or chemically incompatible materials. Where the product presents a health, flammability or corrosion hazard, provide the current safety data and obtain a competent application and site assessment.
| Filling approach | Useful starting applications | Questions to resolve |
|---|---|---|
| Volumetric or piston filling | Many liquids, creams, sauces, gels and pastes where a repeatable displaced volume is suitable. | Viscosity range, particles, product temperature, cylinder or dose range, suck-back or shut-off need, cleaning and nozzle geometry. |
| Peristaltic filling | Small liquid doses and applications where the product can remain within replaceable tubing. | Tubing compatibility, tube life, liquid viscosity, dose range, calibration, product recovery and the effect of tubing condition. |
| Gear, diaphragm or other pump filling | Liquids and pastes that can be metered by the selected pump and controlled delivery path. | Pump compatibility, shear, solids, priming, pressure, valve arrangement, cleaning and whether product properties vary. |
| Vacuum or level filling | Rigid containers where a consistent visible level is important and the product/process suits the method. | Container rigidity, neck finish, seal at the filling head, product foaming, return path and level tolerance. |
| Weight filling | Products where net mass is the controlling measure and the pack can be weighed during dosing. | Scale resolution and environment, vibration, tare variation, in-flight material, settle time and legal-metrology needs where applicable. |
| Auger filling | Powders and fine products that can be metered by a rotating auger. | Bulk-density stability, flight geometry, agitation, dust, bridging, product compaction, cut-off and check-weigh strategy. |
| Vibratory or gravity feeding | Free-flowing granules, pieces and some powders where controlled feed to a weigh system or pack is suitable. | Flowability, breakage, segregation, fine material, target weight, vibration sensitivity and product presentation. |
This table is a selection starting point, not a machine specification. More than one method may work, and a representative trial is often the quickest way to compare fill quality, cleanliness and cycle consistency.
Provide the container drawing or representative samples, including the smallest opening, least stable shape and any flexible packs. Record internal features that trap air or affect level, plus the usable headspace and the position of the fill nozzle. For pouches, identify how the mouth is held open, whether the pack is pre-made or formed on the machine, and what must happen before sealing.
Describe the acceptance measure. It may be a target volume, net mass, visible level, minimum/maximum limit or process dose. Include the permissible product on the neck or seal area, acceptable dripping or stringing, aeration, splashing and any need to fill from the bottom upward. Do not assume that an attractive fill at one rate will remain acceptable when product temperature or batch condition changes.
A semi-automatic filler can suit frequent product changes, smaller batches or manual container presentation. An automatic filler adds container control, indexing or continuous movement, sensors, conveyor interfaces and fault handling. The appropriate route depends on the labour task being removed, the sustained finished-pack requirement, changeover pattern and the reliability of upstream container supply and downstream discharge.
Nozzle selection is part of the application. The bore must suit flow and particles; the tip may need a shut-off, suck-back or diving movement; and nozzle spacing must match the container array. The product feed system—hopper, supply tank, pump, pipework or vacuum source—must maintain the conditions assumed during the trial. Where the product can settle or separate, agitation or recirculation may be relevant, but it should be assessed against product quality and cleaning.
List which parts contact the product and how they will be emptied, removed, flushed, cleaned, dried and reassembled. Confirm access around nozzles, hoses, pumps, valves, cylinders, hoppers and guarding. If multiple products share the machine, define the change sequence and the evidence needed before restart. A fast mechanical format change has limited value if product recovery, cleaning and recalibration dominate the downtime.
Calibration should use the production product and pack. For weight-controlled checks, define the scale and sampling method. For volumetric checks, agree how temperature, density and entrained air will be handled. Record the recipe, machine settings, product condition and components used so that a successful trial can be repeated.
Browse the filling machinery hub, including liquid filling, paste filling, powder and granule filling, weight filling and sachet filling.
Prepare representative product, packs, acceptance checks and a repeatable test sequence.
Review product-contact parts, access, drain-down, cleaning and format conversion.
Compare operator involvement, flexibility, infeed handling and integration before choosing automation level.
There is no single answer. Piston or suitable pump systems are common starting points, but the correct choice depends on viscosity range, particles, temperature, shear sensitivity, cleaning, dose and the required nozzle cut-off. A product trial should confirm the result.
State the acceptance limits and the conditions under which they apply. Product density, temperature, aeration, container tare, scale method and sample procedure can all change the reported result.
The quantity depends on priming, pipework and hopper volume, the number of formats, cleaning losses and the number of cycles required. Agree the test plan first so that enough representative product is supplied without unnecessary waste.
Often it can, but the range must be checked against nozzle spacing, container opening, conveyor handling, indexing, fill range and change parts. Include every intended format in the enquiry.
A diving or bottom-up nozzle may help with products that foam, splash or need controlled deposition, but the movement, container clearance and cycle effect must be assessed during the application review.
Ready to discuss the application?
Send Lancing the product, pack and project information for an application review and tailored quotation.
© Copyright 2025 by Lancing Ltd - all right reserved terms & conditions